β
(Think of this as an introduction to your product- make it remarkable!)
Imagine having access to any car you can think of, whenever you need it, without the hassles that come with car ownership. That is Zoomcar.
With Zoomcar, you can:
Whether it's a quick errand or a weekend getaway, Zoomcar provides the convenience of a personal vehicle with the flexibility of a rental. Zoomcar is not just about renting cars; it's about giving you the keys to freedom.
Problem statement:
The desire to drive yourself in a foreign place, with the car of your choosing
Basic features and functionalities:
Book cars for certain periods of time based on a slot based booking system
Right place, right time availablility - Thereβs always a Zoomcar near you. Localized supply availability
Standardization of experience- Booking experience, quality, driving/car experience
β
What other ways are users using to solve the same problem? If it is a new category, how else were people solving the problem?
Revv, Drivezy, Myles, Third party services
β
β
Zoomcar offers the freedom and flexibility of personal car ownership without the long-term commitment and costs, providing convenient, on-demand access to a wide range of self-drive vehicles for any occasion.
β
Users of zoomcar fall into two major categories:
1. Youth in college looking for a car for short trips outside the college, for the weekend. They need a car every few months, for a day or two at maximum.
β
2. Professionals, couples/singles without children, who need a car for short trips outside the city or longer outstation trips but don't want to deal with the hassle of owning/maintaining a car. They need a car every 3-6 months, for around 3-5 days on average.
Core insights -
The main usecase is for short trips which are slightly outside where the customers reside, or longer trips when going outstation.
Costs are almost always distributed among multiple people.
Atleast half of the folks using the app stopped because of a bad experience
The changeover from Zoomcar owned vehicles to the car marketplace model has brought in a greater degree of unreliability on quality of experience.
The expectations from the hosts of the cars are too high, and they are not following protocols set by the team.
There are very few competitors to zoomcar, except revv. The ceiling to entry and booking is much more variable on zoomcar, and revv is much more consistent and in the middle.
A trip that costs anywhere from 9k-45k, costs 22k on revv
β
Hypotheses -
People have no understanding of why a car costs 5 times as much to rent as another car.
The app date change system is unintuitive, you have to understand host blocking to understand how it works.
Host delivery doesn't work, hosts will not want to deliver you their cars.
(There are separate tables for both B2C and B2B products, put down your your ICPβs in a Table Format, use this as a reference.
This table makes it super clear for anyone to understand who your users are and what differentiates them)
β
B2C Table
Criteria | ICP 1 | ICP 2 |
---|---|---|
Age | 18-23 | 23-35 |
Demographics | College Students | Young professionals |
Need | Short weekend trips, social outings | Outstation trips, weekend getaways, occasional business travel |
Pain Point | Limited budget, lack of parking space, can't afford car ownership | Hassle of car ownership, infrequent need, urban parking challenges |
Solution | Affordable, short-term rentals with campus-proximate pickup/drop-off | Flexible, hassle-free rentals for various durations and vehicle types |
Behaviour | Spontaneous, price-sensitive, tech-savvy, influenced by peers | Planned, quality-conscious, convenience-oriented, values experiences |
Perceived Value of Brand | Medium-High | High |
Marketing Pitch | "Affordable cars for unforgettable college adventures!" | "Enjoy the journey, skip the ownership - Smart travel for the modern professional" |
Goals | Gain independence, create memories, explore on a budget | Balance work-life, travel comfortably, smart financial decisions |
Frequency of use case | Quarterly (every 3-4 months) | Bi-annually (every 5-6 months) |
Average Spend on the product | 5-10k per trip | 15-25k per trip |
Value Accessibility to product | Medium (budget constraints, but high desire) | High (financially stable, values convenience) |
Value Experience of the product | High (novelty and freedom factor) | High (quality and flexibility appreciation) |
Preferred Vehicle Types | Compact cars, hatchbacks | Sedans, SUVs for better storage, and for longer trips |
Primary Influence Factors | Peer recommendations, social media, budget deals | Online reviews, convenience, service quality |
Booking Behavior | Last-minute, mobile app-centric | Planned in advance, cross-platform (web & app) |
Brand Loyalty | Moderate - price-sensitive, may switch for better deals | High - values consistency and quality |
Referral Likelihood | High - if incentivized | Moderate - based on consistent good experiences |
β
We have multiple users of a product and not all of them can be our ICP for whom we make our strategies, we need to prioritize.
(use this ICP prioritization table)
Criteria | ICP 1 | ICP 2 |
---|---|---|
Adoption Curve | High (Tech Savvy) | High (Tech Savvy) |
Appetite to Pay | Low | High |
Frequency of Use Case | Medium (Quarterly) | Low (Half-yearly) |
Distribution Potential | High | High |
TAM | Medium | High |
β
β
β
Factors | Zoomcar | Revv | Mom and Pop rentals(Non-formalized rentals) |
---|---|---|---|
Core offering | Self-drive car rentals | Self-drive rentals & subscriptions | Local self-drive rentals |
Target users | Urban young professionals, college students | Young professionals, families | Budget-conscious locals, travelers |
What are the products/features/services being offered? | Wide range of vehicles | Smaller range of vehicles | Basic car rentals |
GTM Strategy | Digital marketing(Linkedin and Instagram) | Digital video marketing(Facebook, Youtube) | Word of mouth marketing |
What channels do they use? | Mobile app | Mobile app Website Social media Automotive partnerships | Local classifieds Physical locations/offices Phone bookings |
What pricing model do they operate on? | Dynamic pricing Hourly, daily, weekly rates | Subscription model (monthly/yearly) Traditional rental pricing Promotional offers for long-term | Negotiable rates Often cheaper than formalized competitors Flexible payment terms |
How have they raised funding? | Company Stage: Series E | Company Stage: Acquired by CarDekho | β |
Brand Positioning | Tech-savvy, convenient urban mobility solution | Affordable, Convenient & Safe Cars you can count on | locally-trusted option with flexible pricing |
UX Evaluation | Okayish mobile app experience Feature descriptions are incomplete | User-friendly app and website Very simple and straightforward | No App |
What is your productβs Right to Win? | Established brand in the self-drive segment Wide network and vehicle variety No other people involved in any stage of the booking process, just unlock the car with your phone and go | Consistency of experience Partnerships with car manufacturers | Local knowledge and relationships Highly flexible terms β Often more affordable |
What can you learn from them? | NA | Potential of subscription models Importance of manufacturer partnerships | Value of personal service Importance of local market knowledge |
β
The car rental market in India is projected to grow at a CAGR of 6.80% from 2024-2029, resulting in a projected market volume of US$4.39bn by 2029. (Statista)
By 2029, the number of users in the Car Rentals market is expected to reach 119.80m users.
The average revenue per user (ARPU) is expected to be US$39.30.
Key Trends
β
Tailwinds
Headwinds
β
β
β | Reasoning | Calculations |
---|---|---|
TAM | Urban adults (20-45): 40% of 500 million = 200 million | Applying factors: Middle class or above: 28% of 200 million = 56 million
Travelers: 25% of 16.8 million = 4.2 million Non-car owners: 70% of 4.2 million = 2.94 million Approximately 2.35 million or about 1.47% of the urban adult population (20-45) TAM = 2.35Mn*5000=11.75 billion rupees. |
SAM |
| SAM = 5.875 billion rupees |
SOM | Competition from other companies such as revv, mom and pop stores reduces the market to 50% of SOM | SOM = 2.94 billion rupees |
β
Zoomcar seems to be doing well overall with organic search, they show up as the top result for most major search terms related to rentals
They seem to get most of their traffic through organic and direct search terms.
β
Referral traffic seems to be mainly associated with coupon code websites for discounts, and air travel referrals.
β
β
β
Zoomcar has significant opportunities to engage potential customers at crucial decision-making moments in their travel journey, which they seem to not be doing. These are all the locations where a customer might be in need of a Zoomcar:
To capitalize on these touchpoints, Zoomcar should consider:
β
Content Loop | Hook | Generator |
---|---|---|
Reels around the topics of:
| Travel content creators and influencers | |
Travel blogs | Blogs around the topics of: β Travel locations in India, and things to keep mind of | In house creators and travel blog creators |
β
β
β
By implementing these strategies, Zoomcar can significantly enhance its visibility and accessibility at key moments in the consumer's travel journey, potentially increasing conversions and market share.
β
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth β from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore foundations by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Crack a new job or a promotion with the Career Centre
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patienceβyouβre about to be impressed.